Home Blog Page 19

GSZ: Zimbabwe Needs EPOs to Drive Major Mineral Discoveries

0

ZIMBABWE urgently needs to embrace the Exclusive Prospecting Order (EPO) system to give geologists the room they need to make world-class discoveries, with the country’s last national geological map dating back to 1977 and exploration data lagging far behind regional peers, the Geological Society of Zimbabwe (GSZ) has said.

By Rudairo Mapuranga

Speaking at the Chamber of Mines Annual Conference, GSZ Membership Secretary and Special Programmes Coordinator Gayle Hanssen, a geologist with nearly 40 years of experience, made a passionate case for the EPO system as the foundation for serious mineral exploration.

“You need big ground to look at and you need big information, so that is, of course, our EPO system that the geologists very, very much like,” Hanssen said. “We are definitely advocates for the EPO system.”

Maligreen discovery proves EPO value

Hanssen drew on her personal experience with the discovery of the Maligreen deposit to illustrate why EPOs are essential.

“Having been involved in the discovery of Maligreen, we actually looked at 300 square kilometres and that covered five contiguous EPOs, and we found a one-million-ounce deposit,” she revealed.

“You need a big ground area to narrow down into that and that took us a period of nine years – a full EPO, three plus three plus three. This takes a long period of time.”

She noted that World Bank statistics suggest it takes an average of 12 years to discover a one-million-ounce deposit, meaning even the current EPO system’s maximum six-year term is barely sufficient.

EPOs get recycled, data returns to government

Hanssen explained that exploration is rarely a first-time success.

“The worldwide statistic is that two and a half companies tend to look at the ground prior to discovery. So these EPOs get recycled, and the information goes back into the government resource, which is the Geological Survey of Zimbabwe,” she said.

She described the Geological Survey as the country’s “data repository”, containing “fantastic information, including handwritten reports from the 1890s” – but stressed the urgent need for digitisation.

“We would like it to be a bit more accessible. We need it to be a bit more digital so that people around the world can look at our information,” Hanssen said.

Aeromagnetic data critical for attracting investment

Hanssen recalled how a national aeromagnetic survey at one-kilometre spacing in the 1990s drew significant exploration interest.

“Within about five years of that survey being completed, many companies accessed ground on that,” she said.

However, she warned that Zimbabwe is falling behind its neighbours.

“Zambia, Congo, Namibia, and Angola have or are currently flying their countries at 100 to 300 metres spacing – three times more resolution than what we have in our country – and it makes a phenomenal difference to ground selection,” Hanssen said.

Potential beyond greenstone belts

While acknowledging that most of Zimbabwe’s gold has historically come from the country’s 22 Archean greenstone belts, which have produced over 60 million ounces of gold, Hanssen urged exploration beyond these traditional areas.

“Forbes says our gold is all in the greenstone belts. There’s gold elsewhere in the world, and there are very big discoveries being made in different formations. I do believe that we have potential in those domains as well,” she said.

She noted that Zimbabwe currently has only one one-million-ounce deposit outside the greenstone belts – Renco Mine in the Limpopo Mobile Belt.

Retaining talent, building research capacity

Hanssen raised concerns about brain drain in the geological profession.

“Zimbabwe exports some of the best geologists in Africa, but I also believe that we need to remain current because many of our people are outside the country,” she said.

She pointed to Ghana’s successful industry-funded research and development programme over the past 15 to 20 years as a model Zimbabwe could emulate.

“We need to know the ages of our rocks in Zimbabwe. It’s not necessarily just assays that we go on; it’s many other things for us to understand our geological potential,” Hanssen said.

“We need to see a whole lot more people at doctorate and professor level for our research and development – and those are the people, along with government aeromagnetic projects, that drive investment.”

African capital for African exploration

Hanssen challenged the notion that junior mining companies are solely a Western stock exchange phenomenon.

“Juniors are not a Western stock exchange thing; it’s available risk capital. Even if we talk about juniors, we’re not talking about just the Toronto Stock Exchange, we are talking about African investments in African countries,” she said.

“There’s a lot of money in Africa. I look at the Copperbelt a bit – there’s money up there that’s also looking for gold investment opportunities outside copper investment.”

Her remarks come as the Government moves to review the EPO framework, with the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill currently before Parliament seeking to address concerns about EPOs and introduce frameworks that enable small-scale miners to be formally recognised.

The GSZ has been at the forefront of advocating for exploration reform, with the society’s 2025 Summer Symposium highlighting how the suspension of EPOs since the early 2000s has stalled new large-scale discoveries, driven skills migration, and fuelled informal mining.

The Handshake That Cost a Fortune: Why Every Mining Joint Venture Needs a Written Contract

0

A legal perspective on the pitfalls of informal mining partnerships in Zimbabwe, the sanctity of contracts, and how to protect your investment.

By Namatirai Ruzvidzo

It was a Tuesday morning when a thoroughly haggard but energetic young man (let us call him Tendai) walked into my office. By the look of things, this young man was coming from an environment punctuated with the harshness of the full Zimbabwean summer sun and its sheer forceful nature. His skin and strong, hard hands told the full story before he could even open his mouth. He was a seasoned artisanal miner from Kadoma, with calloused hands and a look of sheer exhaustion. Excitedly, he informed me that he had discovered a promising ‘belt’ on a claim he had pegged two years prior. Lacking the capital for an excavator and a proper milling plant, he had partnered with a Chinese businessman, who agreed to provide the equipment in exchange for a 50% share of the profits.

My first question, as a lawyer, was obviously, “Have you reduced your agreement into writing?” “We shook on it,” the young man told me, his voice excited with the prospects of reaping those promising gold nuggets. “He will bring the machinery, I will provide the claim and the labour.”

Then, the ‘belt’ yielded a spectacular strike. Suddenly, the investor argued that his equipment was worth far more than Tendai’s “sweat equity.” Within a short while, he brought in his own security personnel, locked Tendai out of the site, and claimed the operation was now entirely his. Tendai’s only proof of their agreement was a series of vague WhatsApp messages and that fateful handshake.

As a mining lawyer, I hear variations of Tendai’s story far too often. The Zimbabwean mining sector, particularly the artisanal and small to medium-scale (ASM) industry, is built on relationships. However, when those relationships fracture, the absence of a formal Joint Venture (JV) agreement transforms a profitable enterprise into a legal nightmare.

In this article, I will explore the critical importance of formalising mining partnerships, drawing lessons from recent Zimbabwean case law, statutory requirements, general contract principles and my experience as a Lawyer. Whether you are a small-scale miner seeking capital or an investor looking to enter the sector, understanding the legal framework of joint ventures is your first line of defence.

The illusion of the handshake deal

The foundation of any business relationship is governed by the law of contract. For a contract to be valid, there must be consensus ad idem, a meeting of the minds on all essential terms. While verbal agreements are legally binding in many contexts, proving their existence and exact terms in a court of law is notoriously difficult. When a matter goes to court on the back of verbal agreements, the evidence required is ardent.

In the mining industry, where capital investments are substantial and regulatory compliance is stringent, relying on a verbal agreement is similar to navigating a mine shaft without a headlamp. When disputes arise over profit-sharing, operational control or capital contributions, the party with the most resources usually prevails unless there is a written document clearly delineating rights and obligations.

The principle of pacta sunt servanda, agreements must be kept, is a cornerstone of Zimbabwean law. However, a court cannot enforce an agreement it cannot verify. A comprehensive JV agreement serves as the definitive record of the parties’ intentions, mitigating the risk of memory lapses or deliberate misrepresentation.

Lessons from the Courts: The Agrivi Open Mining Case

The necessity of precise, written agreements was recently underscored in a matter before the High Court in Bulawayo. In June 2026, the court delivered a judgment in a dispute between Agrivi Open Mining (Private) Limited and Ms Molly Dick, the holder of a Special Grant.1

The parties had entered into a Joint Venture Agreement in April 2021, under which Ms Dick allocated 50 hectares of her 186-hectare concession to Agrivi for mining operations. An addendum was later signed confirming that Agrivi had fulfilled its payment obligations and was entitled to undisturbed occupation.

However, relations deteriorated when Ms Dick claimed that one of the coordinates defining the joint venture area was incorrect, allegedly causing a boundary dispute with a neighbouring farmer. Without seeking regulatory or judicial intervention, she attempted to unilaterally disrupt Agrivi’s operations.

Justice Joel Mambara granted a final interdict protecting Agrivi from interference. The judge emphasised that contracts voluntarily entered into must be respected. He ruled that Ms Dick could not depart from the arrangement by merely asserting that a coordinate was mistaken, especially without expert survey evidence or official determination.

The court’s ruling highlighted a crucial lesson for all miners: contractual obligations cannot be suspended simply because circumstances later become inconvenient. Furthermore, the court noted that while boundary corrections could be made, they must be handled through lawful processes involving competent mining authorities, such as the Provincial Mining Director, rather than through unilateral action or self-help

This case perfectly illustrates why a meticulously drafted JV agreement, complete with verified coordinates and clear dispute resolution mechanisms, is indispensable. Had the agreement been vague, Agrivi might have lost access to their legitimate mining area.

The Regulatory landscape and the Mines and Minerals Act [Chapter 21:05]

Zimbabwe’s mining sector is primarily governed by the Mines and Minerals Act [Chapter 21:05]. The legislation establishes a comprehensive framework for the acquisition, maintenance, and transfer of mining rights. It is essential to understand that mining rights are vested in the President, and miners operate under licenses or grants issued by the state.

When forming a joint venture, parties must ensure their agreement aligns with statutory requirements. For instance, the Act mandates that certain transactions and agreements involving mining titles require the approval of the Mining Affairs Board. A JV agreement that contravenes these provisions may be deemed invalid or unenforceable.

Furthermore, the legal landscape is evolving. The proposed Mines and Minerals Bill, gazetted in 2025, seeks to introduce significant reforms, including the establishment of a Mining Cadastre Register and stricter requirements for environmental restoration. Additionally, the government’s free-carry stake policy, which mandates a 26% state shareholding in new greenfield mining projects, adds another layer of complexity for large-scale investors.

For small to medium-scale operators, these regulatory shifts underscore the need for legal counsel when drafting JV agreements. A standard template downloaded from the internet will rarely suffice in a highly regulated and dynamic environment. There is need for that human touch which often delve from previous experience. As Lawyers, when we draft agreements, we derive the content from previous mistakes and pitfalls which we would have noted from our clients.

Essential elements of a Mining Joint Venture Agreement

To prevent the scenario Tendai faced, and to avoid the litigation seen in the Agrivi case, a robust JV agreement must address several critical components as follows:

1. Clear definition of contributions

The agreement must explicitly state what each party is bringing to the venture. If one party provides the claim and the other provides capital or equipment, the valuation of these contributions must be agreed upon and documented. This prevents later disputes over “sweat equity” versus financial investment.

2. Profit and Loss distribution

A number of clients I have met over the years assume that ownership ratios are the only critical aspect which define a Joint Venture agreement. Well, I have to advise that percentages do not automatically dictate profit distribution. The agreement must detail how operational expenses are deducted, when and how profits are distributed, and crucially, how losses are allocated. This is because the Joint Venture partnership should be operated critically from a business perspective.

3. Roles, responsibilities, and control

Who makes the day-to-day operational decisions? Who handles financial reporting? The agreement must establish a clear management structure and define the scope of authority for each partner. Deadlock resolution mechanisms are vital for when partners fundamentally disagree.

Mining carries significant environmental and safety responsibilities under the Environmental Management Act and mining regulations. The JV agreement must specify who is responsible for securing permits, ensuring compliance, and bearing the cost of environmental rehabilitation. More often than not, in allocating each other profits, Joint Venture partners only allocate themselves profits but do not then make decisions on who will bear the cost of rehabilitating the environment.

5. Dispute resolution and exit strategies

Litigation is expensive and time-consuming. I always advise my clients that litigation is as a matter of last resort. Courts are not the friendliest of places. If an agreement is well-drafted, it should include mandatory mediation or arbitration clauses to resolve disputes confidentially and efficiently. Furthermore, it must outline clear exit strategies, such as buyout mechanisms or dissolution procedures, for when a partner wishes to leave or breaches the agreement.

Conclusion: Protecting the Partnership

Returning to Tendai’s story, his situation was dire but not entirely hopeless. We were eventually able to secure a settlement through mediation, leveraging evidence of the Chinese businessman’s financial deposits and witness testimonies. However, the process cost Tendai months of lost production and significant legal fees, resources that could have been saved with a simple, written agreement at the outset.

A Joint Venture agreement is not a sign of distrust; it is the ultimate expression of professionalism. It provides a clear roadmap for success and a safety net for when things go wrong. In the high-stakes world of mining, your handshake might initiate the partnership, but only a solid legal contract will protect it.


About the Author:

Namatirai Ruzvidzo is a registered Legal Practitioner, Conveyancer and Notary Public. She specialises in Commercial law, Mining law and Property law. She practices in Avondale, Harare, under the Law Firm Ruzvidzo Legal Counsel.

She can be reached on +263 784 228 534 or by emailing [email protected], copying [email protected]

Gold buying prices in Zimbabwe per gram/ ounce, 24 June 2026

Gold buying prices in Zimbabwe per gram/ ounce, 24 June 2026, from the official gold buyer and exporter, Fidelity Gold Refinery (FGR).

1 oz = 31.1035 g

CategoryPrice (US$/g)Price (US$/oz)
SG 90% and Above123.033,826.96
SG 85% but Less Than 90%121.733,786.53
SG 80% but Less Than 85%120.433,746.09
SG 75% but Less Than 80%119.133,705.66
Sample (5–10 g)117.173,644.69
Fire Assay (Cash)123.683,847.18

 

Note: The Fire Assay cash price applies to gold above 100g, with no sample deduction.

A sample of not more than 10g is deducted for the Fire Assay Transfer price.


#GoldPrices #GoldBuying #GoldMarket #GoldTrading #GoldRate #GoldPriceToday #GoldNews #PreciousMetals #GoldIndustry #GoldEconomy #FidelityGoldRefinery

Geo Associates has barely scratched surface of Mzarabani’s vast gas potential

0

Geo Associates has drilled just two wells across its 360,000-hectare Mzarabani licence, meaning the project’s true potential remains largely untapped, according to founder and managing director Paul Chimbodza.

By Rudairo Mapuranga

Speaking at the Chamber of Mines Annual Conference, Chimbodza said the company’s two wells – Mukuyu 1 and Mukuyu 2 – are located approximately seven kilometres apart, a tiny fraction of the exploration area.

“If you just suppose that with a licence area that is 360,000 hectares, what it says is we have barely scratched the surface,” Chimbodza said.

“The two wells, Mukuyu 1 and Mukuyu 2, seven kilometres apart, in a licence area as big as this room, we’ve just scratched the corner.”

The Mzarabani project is licensed under Geo Associates, with Invictus Energy – an Australian-listed company – holding 80 percent and One Gas Resources holding the remaining 20 percent. Chimbodza clarified the ownership structure to address what he described as “a lot of confusion in the marketplace.”

The initial licence area of 100,000 hectares has since been expanded to 360,000 hectares through collaboration with the Mutapa Investment Fund.

Chimbodza said the company has generated more than a dozen drill-ready targets across the licence area, giving Geo Associates an embarrassment of riches.

“In most exploration projects, the problem is to generate targets that you can follow up for drilling or targets that are worthy of drilling,” he said. “In our case, we are spoiled for choice on where to drill.”

He noted that Mobil had explored the area for about 10 years, leaving behind seismic data that Geo Associates has reinterpreted using modern computing power and software.

“I normally talk of, you know, if you had a scan done in 1980, and then you compare that with an MRI scan today, the resolution is so different,” Chimbodza said. “That’s all we did with the Mobil data. We subjected it to new techniques, new resolution, and we started picking up what Mobil couldn’t pick up then.”

The company subsequently conducted its own seismic survey to validate the findings.

Gas Market Now Exists Where None Did Before

Chimbodza noted that while Mobil had explored the area some 40 years ago, the project was never developed because there was no market for gas at the time.

“If you go back 40 years ago, the gas market was non-existent,” he said. “Even in our homes 40 years ago, no one was using cooking gas.”

“Fast forward to today, there is a huge market, not only in Zimbabwe but in the region.”

He said the project is well-positioned to supply gas-to-power projects, with every country in the region facing power shortages.

Chimbodza framed the resource in stark terms, measuring gas in trillion cubic feet.

“One TCF is big enough to power a 500-megawatt power station for 50 years,” he said.

With infrastructure already available in the region that can be retrofitted, the project could supply power to Zimbabwe’s energy-hungry economy and beyond.

Chimbodza explained that Geo Associates operates under a production-sharing agreement with the government, under which the company explores at its own risk.

“If you don’t find anything, tough luck, because that’s your business,” he said. “If you find something, we will allow you to recoup your costs, plus a small premium… What is left on the table, we then share with the Government of Zimbabwe.”

‘Money Is There, but Miners Can’t See It’: Mnangagwa Offers Local Financing Key

0

THERE is abundant capital sloshing around Zimbabwe’s economy waiting to find a home in the mining sector, but a disconnect between available funds and accessible investment opportunities is preventing locals from participating in the country’s mineral wealth, Deputy Minister of Finance, Economic Development and Investment Promotion David Kudakwashe Mnangagwa has said.

By Rudairo Mapuranga

Speaking at the Chamber of Mines Annual Conference in Victoria Falls, the Deputy Minister issued a direct challenge to mining industry players to look beyond traditional offshore financing and aggressively pursue local sources of capital.

“In our estimation, the monies are there, but there is a dissonance between how people can access your mines,” Mnangagwa said. “Every Zimbabwean who is holding cash wants to participate in mining in one manner or the other, but there’s a huge gap in distance. Our capital markets are the only way that we can bridge that gap.”

The Deputy Minister highlighted the recent launch of Zimbabwe’s first gold-backed Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) on the Victoria Falls Stock Exchange (VFEX) as a prime example of how local capital can be mobilised for the mining sector.

“A few weeks ago, we launched our first mutual gold ETF,” Mnangagwa said. “There’s been a call within the room that maybe access to global capital might be diminishing. There’s a lot of capital that is sloshing around within our economy that is failing to find a home and ends up in luxuries.”

The First Mutual Wealth Gold ETF began trading on the VFEX on 8 May 2026 and delivered an impressive debut, surging nearly 40 percent during its first trading session. The ETF opened at an issue price of 10 US cents before closing at 13.94 US cents, with 357,257 units exchanging hands on the opening day.

Mnangagwa said the listing sends “a strategic signal to both local and international investors that Zimbabwe’s financial markets are evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated”.

Notably, retail investors contributed more than 60 percent of total subscriptions during the ETF’s subscription phase, significantly exceeding the VFEX’s initial public spread target of 30 percent. The minimum investment threshold was set at just US$100, making the product accessible to ordinary Zimbabweans.

“We are trying as government to deepen our financial sector through the creation of instruments that will allow investment, even from our locals,” Mnangagwa said. “We’d like to make sure that we build a homegrown and competitive industry to make sure that the synergies that are there are fully capitalised.”

Policy Openness to Industry Input

The Deputy Minister also addressed concerns raised by outgoing Chamber of Mines President John Musekiwa regarding the royalty framework, which Musekiwa had described as potentially suboptimal.

“I’m not entirely sure, but we always invite players to sit down with the Ministry of Finance and we go through your financial modelling,” Mnangagwa said. “We like financial modelling so that policy is informed by numbers and facts, not by perception.”

He extended an open invitation to the industry: “If, as an industry, there is a widespread feeling that the framework in place is not effective, our doors are always open.”

The Deputy Minister noted that over the past five years, the mining sector has recorded robust and sustained performance, with average growth estimated at around 9 percent annually. The PGM sector remains one of the most important export sectors, contributing significantly to foreign currency earnings.

He reaffirmed government’s commitment to maintaining Zimbabwe’s attractiveness as a competitive mining investment destination while ensuring the country derives fair, sustainable value from its finite mineral resources.

The mining sector continues to benefit from various tax incentives, including accelerated depreciation of capital assets, indefinite carry-forward of losses, 0 percent customs duty on imported capital equipment, and deferment of VAT for up to three years on projects with longer gestation periods.

On foreign exchange, Mnangagwa acknowledged delays in the payment of surrender portions of export proceeds, an issue raised by the outgoing Chamber president.

“I believe something has been happening in the last few weeks. If it hasn’t been happening as we’ve been briefed, then we need to continue discussing that,” he said.

Under the current framework, mining exporters retain 70 percent of their export proceeds in foreign currency, with the remaining 30 percent surrendered to formal foreign exchange markets at the prevailing official exchange rate.

The Deputy Minister emphasised that the future of Zimbabwe’s mining sector lies not only in extraction but also in downstream processing, refining and industrial development, particularly in strategic minerals such as PGMs and lithium.

“Beneficiation investments require substantial capital, advanced technologies, and long-term financing arrangements,” he said. “Government remains committed to continuously strengthening policy frameworks that support value addition and maximise domestic value retention.”

The conference, running under the theme “Unlock Value, Maximise Benefits, Sustain Growth”, brought together mining executives, investors, policymakers and industry suppliers at a time when the sector has become the country’s strongest lever for economic growth and foreign currency generation.

“As government advances the beneficiation and value addition agenda, the alignment between fiscal policy and foreign exchange policy becomes increasingly important,” Mnangagwa said.

Kambamura Vows Uncompromising War on Mineral Smuggling

0

Zimbabwe’s Mines and Mining Development Minister Dr Polite Kambamura has declared a renewed offensive against the illicit export of gold, lithium and diamonds, vowing that the government will pursue traffickers with relentless force as the country moves to plug a leak that has cost it billions in lost revenue, Mining Zimbabwe can report.

By Ryan Chigoche

Speaking at the just-concluded Chamber of Mines of Zimbabwe Annual General Meeting and Conference, Dr Kambamura said mineral leakages are bleeding the economy of critical foreign currency, state revenue and jobs.

“We remain uncompromising in combating gold leakages and smuggling. Every gram of gold lost through illicit channels represents lost foreign currency, lost revenue and lost national development opportunities,” he said. “A tonne of lithium smuggled out of the country, a carat of diamond exported illicitly — that is revenue lost and jobs exported.”

The minister’s tough stance follows persistent concerns over illicit flows in the extractive sector. The Centre for Natural Resource Governance has estimated that up to 36 tonnes of gold could be smuggled out of Zimbabwe annually, more than half of official production at the time.

Investigators have described Zimbabwe’s mineral leakages as “industrial-scale looting”, involving “a complex web of criminal syndicates, state-embedded actors and private-sector entities”, according to a 2025 report by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime. “Non-renewable resource crimes are among Zimbabwe’s most profitable illicit markets,” the report added.

Lithium smuggling networks exploit porous borders through mislabelled shipments, forged customs documents and bribes paid to border officials. In one case, a truck driver carrying a sealed container he believed held chrome was impounded after inspectors discovered raw lithium inside — an illegal export under Zimbabwean law. Officials sometimes lack the geological expertise to identify lithium ores, creating gaps that are easily exploited by exporters.

Investigative journalists have played a pivotal role in exposing smuggling networks. In April 2025, an undercover investigation by Oxpeckers uncovered a transnational lithium smuggling ring moving ore through South Africa and Mozambique, revealing how “majors” (local fixers) and compromised border guards facilitated the illicit trade.

The investigation also highlighted a startling anomaly. South Africa, which has minimal domestic lithium production, suddenly recorded a 147,000-tonne surge in lithium ore exports to China in 2024, pointing directly to Zimbabwe as the source.

Against this backdrop, Kambamura said cracking down on smuggling is the critical first step towards safeguarding Zimbabwe’s mineral wealth and warned that the government would not compromise in its efforts to stem the outflow of unprocessed minerals.

Zimbabwe is estimated to lose up to US$15 billion annually through illicit financial flows (IFFs), with gold and precious stones identified as major drivers.

These outflows exceed the government’s entire US$12 billion mining sector target, underscoring the devastating economic impact of smuggling.

“It is looting at an industrial scale,” said Farai Maguwu, executive director of the Centre for Natural Resource Governance.

Despite government pledges and a raft of policy interventions, including a ban on raw lithium exports, smuggling networks continue to exploit weak enforcement, official complicity and porous borders.

The scale of losses has led observers to warn that, without genuine institutional reform, Zimbabwe’s mineral wealth will continue to enrich foreign markets and criminal syndicates rather than its own citizens.


#ZimbabweMining #GoldMining #LithiumMining #DiamondMining #MineralSmuggling #MiningNews #MiningZimbabwe #CriticalMinerals #ResourceGovernance #MiningIndustry

Gold buying prices in Zimbabwe per gram/ ounce, 23 June 2026

Gold buying prices in Zimbabwe per gram/ ounce, 23 June 2026, from the official gold buyer and exporter, Fidelity Gold Refinery (FGR).

1 oz = 31.1035 g

CategoryPrice (US$/g)Price (US$/oz)
SG 90% and Above125.003,887.93
SG 85% but Less Than 90%123.683,846.87
SG 80% but Less Than 85%122.353,805.50
SG 75% but Less Than 80%121.033,764.45
Sample (5–10 g)119.053,702.86
Fire Assay (Cash)125.663,908.46

 

Note: The Fire Assay cash price applies to gold above 100g, with no sample deduction.

A sample of not more than 10g is deducted for the Fire Assay Transfer price.


#GoldPrices #GoldBuying #GoldMarket #GoldTrading #GoldRate #GoldPriceToday #GoldNews #PreciousMetals #GoldIndustry #GoldEconomy #FidelityGoldRefinery

African Governments Push for Bigger Share of Mining Wealth as Critical Minerals Boom Reshapes Policy

0

A new wave of resource nationalism is gathering pace across Africa as governments seek a larger stake in the continent’s mineral wealth, signalling a shift from decades of investor-friendly mining policies toward greater state participation and tighter control over strategic resources, Mining Zimbabwe reports.

By Ryan Chigoche

The trend was thrust into the spotlight this month when Mozambique approved sweeping amendments to its mining law requiring the state to hold a non-dilutable 15% stake in all mining projects. The reforms also oblige mining companies to process minerals locally where feasible, marking one of the most assertive attempts by an African government to capture more value from its natural resources.

The move comes just weeks after Zimbabwe unveiled a new Critical, Special Critical and Strategic Minerals Framework that similarly seeks to increase government participation in projects involving minerals deemed vital to national development and the global energy transition.

While the two countries have adopted different approaches, both policies reflect a growing conviction among African governments that the continent should retain a larger share of the benefits generated by its vast deposits of lithium, copper, cobalt, nickel, graphite, gold and platinum.

Under Zimbabwe’s framework, minerals have been classified into three categories. Strategic minerals include gold, diamonds and platinum group metals, while lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite and rare earth elements fall under the critical minerals category because of their importance to battery technologies and clean energy supply chains.

The policy provides for mandatory state participation through special purpose vehicles in projects involving these minerals. It also grants the government pre-emptive rights over transfers of mining assets and allows authorities to exercise first-refusal rights where strategic mineral interests are being sold. Officials have argued the measures are necessary to safeguard national interests in resources considered essential to future economic growth.

The framework builds on a broader policy shift already underway in Zimbabwe. Authorities have tightened restrictions on exports of unprocessed minerals, pushed mining companies toward local beneficiation and recently reserved small- and medium-scale gold mining for Zimbabwean citizens and locally controlled entities.

For many governments, the changes are being driven by a simple question: how can countries rich in minerals remain poor while global demand for those same resources continues to surge?

Africa holds some of the world’s most sought-after deposits of minerals needed for electric vehicles, renewable energy systems and energy storage technologies. Yet policymakers increasingly argue that much of the value chain remains concentrated outside the continent, leaving producing countries with limited benefits beyond royalties, taxes and employment.

That sentiment has been gaining traction across several mining jurisdictions. The Democratic Republic of the Congo has strengthened state oversight of its cobalt sector, while Tanzania, Zambia and Burkina Faso have all pursued policies aimed at increasing domestic participation or expanding national benefits from mining.

Supporters of the emerging approach argue that greater state participation can help governments secure long-term revenues, encourage industrialisation and ensure strategic resources contribute more directly to national development. They point to countries that exported raw minerals for decades without building significant downstream industries.

Mining investors, however, have traditionally viewed ownership restrictions and state participation requirements with caution. Developing large-scale mines often requires billions of dollars in capital and years of exploration, feasibility studies and infrastructure development before a project generates returns. Industry executives warn that policy uncertainty can raise investment risk and make it harder for countries to compete for global capital.

The debate is particularly relevant for Zimbabwe, which is seeking to attract fresh investment into lithium, gold and platinum projects while simultaneously expanding local value addition and strengthening state oversight of strategic minerals. Although the government has announced mandatory participation in designated projects, details regarding the level of ownership to be held by the state have yet to be fully clarified.

Mozambique’s decision to fix the state’s stake at 15% provides investors with greater certainty, even as it increases government involvement. Zimbabwe’s framework, by contrast, has left industry stakeholders watching closely for further regulations that will determine how the policy is implemented in practice.

Taken together, the developments suggest that a new model of African mining policy is emerging—one that no longer focuses solely on attracting investment but increasingly seeks to balance foreign capital with national ownership, local processing and greater control over strategic resources.

As competition for critical minerals intensifies, the challenge for governments will be ensuring that efforts to capture more value from mining do not undermine the investment needed to unlock the very resources they hope will drive future economic growth.

ZiG surrender backlog hits US$228m, platinum producers at breaking point

0

Zimbabwe’s platinum miners are staring down a liquidity abyss as unpaid export surrender balances in ZiG have ballooned to more than US$228 million, pushing an already fragile sector to its operational limits, industry leaders have warned.

By Rudairo Mapuranga

The staggering figure, confirmed at the recent PGM Producers’ Indaba at the Chamber of Mines Annual Conference in Victoria Falls, reflects the growing mismatch between foreign currency earnings and the government’s delayed settlement of the mandatory 30% surrender portion—paid in the local ZiG currency. Producers say the accumulating backlog is not just a balance-sheet headache but an existential threat that is stalling exploration, starving local suppliers, and forcing some operators to review their Zimbabwean exposure.

“The ZiG surrender delays have effectively locked up working capital equivalent to nearly four months of operating costs for some mines,” a senior executive who attended the indaba told Mining Zimbabwe on condition of anonymity. “We’re being asked to fund the state’s cash-flow gap while our own equipment ages, contractors go unpaid, and new shafts remain on ice.”

Fresh concerns have emerged around downstream service providers, while community trust funds are also feeling the pinch, as miners have slashed procurement budgets by over 15% in the first half of 2026 to preserve dollar-denominated reserves. The unpaid ZiG portion, which companies cannot easily use to import critical reagents or pay expatriate staff, has created a perverse two-speed economy within the mining houses.

Valterra’s Unki operation confirmed a US$100 million claim in February. Industry sources now suggest the combined figure has crept higher as new surrenders from Q1 2026 have been added without corresponding settlements.

The crisis comes at a cruel juncture. Global PGM prices recovered modestly from 2025 lows, boosting export earnings to US$1.9 billion last year, but producers argue they cannot leverage that uptick because the ZiG surrender mechanism acts as a drag on dollar liquidity. The central bank and Treasury have acknowledged the backlog and begun partial repayments, but miners say the pace is too slow to reverse project deferrals, notably a planned US$400 million concentrator expansion that has been shelved indefinitely.

Production data underscores the urgency: platinum output dipped to 17,882kg in 2025 from 18,911kg in 2024, while palladium fell to 14,620kg. The Chamber of Mines is forecasting a 5% rebound this year, but that projection hinges on improved cash flow, which the US$228 million ZiG albatross makes increasingly unlikely.

“We are not asking for a waiver or a handout; we are asking for the rules of the game to be honoured,” said Alexander Mhembere, Chair of the Platinum Producers Association. “Every day that this ZiG balance remains unsettled, we are effectively subsidising the fiscal deficit with our own survival. That cannot continue if Zimbabwe wants to remain a top-ten PGM producer.”

Mining executives are now calling for a radical overhaul of the surrender framework—either switching to a fully dollarised export retention model or introducing a guaranteed settlement window of no more than 30 days. Without such reforms, they warn, the US$228 million figure could exceed US$300 million by year-end, turning a crisis point into a full-scale collapse that would imperil 18,000 direct jobs and nearly 30% of formal mining employment.

For now, the sector watches and waits, but patience, like dollar liquidity, is wearing dangerously thin.

Mining sector needs US$10 billion capex to sustain growth, says outgoing Chamber President

0

ZIMBABWE’S mining industry requires approximately US$10 billion in capital investment over the next five years to sustain operations and ramp up output, outgoing Chamber of Mines of Zimbabwe President Mr John Musekiwa has said.

By Rudairo Mapuranga

Delivering his final address at the Chamber’s 26th Annual Mining Conference and Exhibition in Victoria Falls, Mr Musekiwa painted a picture of a sector at a pivotal moment—recording robust growth and record earnings, but facing significant funding constraints that threaten to stall momentum.

The mining sector recovered strongly in 2025, recording growth of around 7 percent compared to 2.3 percent in 2024, Mr Musekiwa reported.

On the back of strong output growth in gold, coal, and lithium, the sector generated a record US$8.5 billion in export earnings in 2025, up from US$5.9 billion in 2024, driven by strong output performance and favourable prices, particularly for gold and PGMs.

The sector accounted for 81 percent of national exports in 2025, paid about 20 percent of earnings to the government through various taxes and levies, and contributed 10 percent to the country’s GDP, employing around 60,000 people in the formal mining sector.

Mr Musekiwa noted that the sector’s multiplier effect is estimated at around 3, “implying that for every dollar generated by the sector, three more dollars are created in other sectors of the economy.”

However, the outgoing president struck a cautionary note on the sector’s ability to sustain its growth trajectory.

“The funding gap to optimise operations and meet output targets remains huge. Approximately US$10 billion is required by the industry in the next five years for sustenance and ramping up output,” he said.

“A significant number of mining companies are struggling to raise offshore funding, thus relying on internally generated resources or retained earnings.”

Mr Musekiwa also highlighted several challenges weighing down the sector’s performance, including high royalties and levies, high capital costs, and uncompetitive electricity tariffs.

“While we appreciate ZESA’s commitment to prioritise mining companies for available power, the power supply situation for the mining industry remains a dominant issue. Some mining companies continue to experience power outages,” he said.

“To this end, some mining houses have been supplementing their power requirements through alternative solutions, including running expensive diesel-powered generators.”

The outgoing president raised concerns about foreign currency shortages affecting expansion projects and beneficiation facilities.

“Our mining houses, specifically those undertaking expansion projects and constructing beneficiation facilities, are reporting that the available foreign currency is inadequate to meet their requirements,” he said.

“It is our humble plea that the government allows mining companies to participate on the Willing Buyer, Willing Seller platform, specifically for legitimate forex requests to supplement their forex requirements.”

He also noted delays in the payment of the surrender portion of export proceeds, which have “adversely affected operating cash flows as well as delayed the execution of capital projects.”

Despite the challenges, the outlook for the mining sector remains bright, with the sector projected to grow by a further 10 percent in 2026 as output for all minerals is expected to expand.

Gold output is expected to increase from 50.6 tonnes in 2025 to around 55 tonnes in 2026, generating corresponding exports of around US$5 billion. PGM output is projected to increase by an average of 5 percent in 2026, with exports reaching US$2 billion. Lithium output is expected to increase to 3 million tonnes in 2026, from around 2.5 million tonnes in 2025, with exports anticipated to reach US$700 million.

“I would like to take this opportunity to thank the executive committee, management, members, and all stakeholders for their support during my tenure,” he said.

“It is without doubt that the Chamber of Mines will remain in safe hands as my able successor, Mr Fungai Makoni, steers the ship as the industry scales to new heights.”